Olamide Thomas Docked For Allegedly Threatening Seyi Tinubu, IGP
Lady docked for purportedly undermining Seyi Tinubu, IGP
A lady, Olamide Thomas, who purportedly undermined Seyi Tinubu with a passing danger via web-based entertainment, was, on Friday, summoned at a Government High Court in Abuja.
Olamide was summoned by the workplace of the Reviewer General (I-G) of Police, Mr Kayode Egbetokun, before Equity Emeka Nwite on a three-count charge.
She, nonetheless, argued not liable to the charge.
The News Organization of Nigeria (NAN) reports that Olamide was captured on charges verging on bugging and compromising Seyi Tinubu, Egbetokun, and the Police Advertising Official, Muyiwa Adejobi, in a viral web-based entertainment post.
In the charge stamped: FHC/ABJ/CR/636/2024, dated and documented on Dec 18 by the police group of legal counselors drove by A.A. Egwu, Olamide was sued as the sole respondent.
Upon continued hearing, Victor Okoye, who showed up for the police, informed the court that the matter was scheduled for arraignment and that he was prepared to continue.
After the counts were perused to the respondent, she argued not blameworthy to the charge.
The guard legal counselor, T. J. Aondo, SAN, tried to move an oral application for his client’s sake, however the solicitation was turned down.
Equity Nwite coordinated Aondo to document a proper bail application and concluded the matter until Dec. 30 for the initiation of preliminary.
The appointed authority, in any case, guaranteed the protection counsel that when a bail application is documented as a movement on notice, the court wouldn’t hold back to hear it.
He thus requested her to be remanded in Suleja Restorative Center forthcoming the knowing about her bail application.
NAN reports that in count one, Olamide was claimed to have, at some point in 2024, purposely and purposefully sent correspondence as video recording through a PC framework or organization on her web-based entertainment stages wherein she offered comments in Yoruba language.
In the video, she was affirmed to have expressed “that Mr Seyi Tinubu would kick the bucket this year, and disaster and catastrophe had happened to the Tinubu family, with goal to menace, compromise, and disturb the individual of Mr Seyi Tinubu.”
The correspondence was said to have set Seyi in apprehension about death, savagery, or substantial damage.
The offense is in opposition to and culpable under Segment 24 (2) (a) of the Cybercrimes (Preclusion, Counteraction, And so forth) (Revision) Act, 2024.
In count two, the litigant was claimed to have purposefully sent correspondence as a video recording wherein she offered comments in Yoruba language to menace, undermine, and pester the individual of Mr Egbetokun.
The correspondence was said to have set Egbetokun in apprehension about death, brutality, or substantial damage.
The offense is in opposition to and culpable under Segment 24 (2) (a) of the Cybercrimes (Restriction, Counteraction, And so forth) (Change) Act, 2024.
In count three, Olamide was blamed for deliberately sending or causing the transmission of correspondence as video recording wherein she offered comments in Yoruba language, expressing that the offspring of Adejobi would all bite the dust before his eyes.
She was cited to have likewise said that “he (Adejobi) will cover every one of his kids in a solitary day, with aim to menace, undermine, and bug the individual of Mr. Muyiwa Adejobi.”
The correspondence was said to have put Adejobi in apprehension about death of his friends and family.
The offense is supposed to be in opposition to and culpable under Segment 24 (2) (a) of Cybercrimes (Preclusion, Counteraction, And so on) (Revision) Act, 2024. (NAN)
Leave a Reply